RenderRate

Home / Kling AI vs Luma

Kling AI vs Luma: which costs less?

The answer depends on how much you make. We priced both at the same monthly volumes, using each tool’s own published plans and credit rates.

See Kling AI plansSee Luma plans

AI-generated video, cheapest models

Kling AI is the cheaper one at 60% of the volumes where they differ, but the lead changes hands 5 times between 5 and 6,000 seconds a month, because both sell their allowance in steps. Check the table for your volume, or use the calculator for an exact figure.

Kling AI is counted at 6 credits per second (VIDEO 3.0, 720p, no audio). Luma is counted at 20 credits per second (Ray3.2, 720p).

Monthly billing, per month. Highlighted: the lower price.
Each monthKling AILuma
60 seconds$8.80Standard$30Plus
300 seconds$32.56Pro$30Plus
900 seconds$80.96Premier$90Pro
1,800 seconds$181.99Premier (18,000 credits)$90Pro

Enter your own volume in the calculator

AI-generated video, higher-end models

From 5 to 55 seconds a month, Kling AI costs less. From 56 to 125 seconds a month, Luma costs less. From 126 to 4,750 seconds a month, Kling AI costs less. From 4,751 to 6,000 seconds a month, neither has a self-serve monthly plan that covers it.

Kling AI is counted at 12 credits per second (VIDEO 3.0, 1080p, native audio). Luma is counted at 80 credits per second (Ray3.2, 1080p).

Monthly billing, per month. Highlighted: the lower price.
Each monthKling AILuma
60 seconds$32.56Pro$30Plus
300 seconds$80.96Premier$90Pro
900 seconds$181.99Premier (18,000 credits)$300Ultra
1,800 seconds$283.99Premier (28,000 credits)$300Ultra

Enter your own volume in the calculator

More on each tool

Both checked against their own pricing pages on or after 14 November 2026. This page compares price only, not quality.